The Home and the world by Rabindranath Tagore

                                                Introduction

The Home and the World is a 1916 novel by Rabindranath Tagore. The book illustrates the battle Tagore had with himself, between the ideas of Western culture and revolution against the Western culture. 

*Rabindranath Tagore was poet, writer and playwrighter and Novelist.

*He became the first non European to win the Nobel prize for Literature in 1913.

*His Novels, stories, song, Essays spoke about political concern. It is particular Novel.

Related with west & Indian culture.

*Tagore describes western culture and revolution against the western culture.

*Novel is about swadeshi Movement.

Boycott of British Goods.

*As a first person narrative divided into 23 chapter.

The Major Character of the Novel

Question 1 : To see the growth of individual character

*The major character of the Novel.

*He is one of the revolutionary Man.

*He has good command over the speech to attract any person would have been participated in his idea about against the western civilization.

*Who is the pioneer of Rally which was in Bangal during the partition time.

*His revolutionary ideas makes effect on Bimala’s Character.

Question 2: To see the psychological growth of characters in the course of the novel

If we can see the story of Three characters, so we can find different kind of observation from the all characters. Also, Three characters has different kind of Mind set to Brings Their idea to depict the reality of whenever india got the freedom so The point is Sandeep's Character has full kind of Rhetorical thoughts to present the as leader of the party, while the Bimal is so innocent and easily kept towards Sandeep and major trustable character is Sandeep has  Innocent and depict  his own western kind of idea to present himself.

Question 3 :Write about Rabindranath Tagore's art of characterization

Tagore characterization, though dependent

on realistic psychological exploration, does not

involve any existentialist choice, as it were, since he is content with lying bare such determinants as are capable of clarifying social relationship and responsibilities deriving from the character’s engagement with life. Tagore was not a committed experimentalist; but to deny him any formal expertise or to judge him solely on the basis of recent innovation in novelistic technique would be indeed far from it. The art of characterization in Tagore’s novels, suffer from a certain weakness of

craftsmanship which results in a kind of diffuseness and looseness a ‘flabbiness’ of narrative. The undue reliance on chance and coincidence in some of the novels and the contrived ending of some other point towards impatience on the part of the novelist in working out a structure of ordered

episodes.

                                                                 Thanks😊