Monday, May 3, 2021

The Reading task on two Short story by Mahendrasinh parmar

                                                 Introduction 

first, we know that who is Mahendrasinh Parmar.

He was born on 2 October 1967 in Naliya, a town in Kutch district of Gujarat.[1] He completed his Master of Arts in Gujarati literature from Bhavnagar University and received Ph.D from same University in 1998.[2] He serves as professor at Bhavnagar University since 1996.

He married in 1996 and has two daughters. He lives in Bhavnagar Since 2002, his short stories appeared in various collection of Gujarati short stories. He has done numerous shows of public reading of literary works under the title Vachikam. His critical works published as Pratham in 2009. Polytechnic (2016) is a short story collection while Rakhdu no Kagal (2016) is a collection of his personal essays. He wrote several plays.

His book Polytechnic (2016) was shortlisted for the Sahitya Akademi Award (2020).


Today, we will see two short story from this book...

1) ISI no hath

The basic concern of the poem is about the Religion. here we have seen so many people who has narrow mindset. if we see the concern of the story is all about satire on Religion. we have know what is about the ISI.

so these three name are on main position.

I  - Ishvar Dabhi


S - Sharad Joshi


I  - Indrajit Dholakiya

 Indrajit was a professor. He talked about the profession of the religious people. Temple became the profession for earning money. He talked about the land on which the temple was built. This land was given by Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji for education purposes but later on this land was taken by religious people to build temples. So how religion ruined education.

Sharad was from poor family. His mother was good cook. His father  and his mother feed people and earning  money. But because of the temple their business was broken because temple provide food to people in 600 Rs per month. Sharad father can't face the reality and died.

Ishvar was Junk Man or Scavenger Or Scrap Collector. He collected old newspapers but when this Temple was built they told the people to give the old newspaper to them. So people think that it would be good to give newspaper to temple so in the name of faith and religion people don't gave old newspaper to Ishvar  so because of that his business was broken.


Connection with Contemporary event:

The professor Indrajeet, when a policeman was inquiring that this land was donated to the University for educational purpose by his highness Maharaja Krishnakumarsihnji, the last Maharaja of Gohil Dynasty. Hence, professor and many others against this temple and also the professor from Chemistry department, and also Sir P.P Institute is connected with the Aksharvadi temple and also this event actually happened in the past.

however, here using word ‘vadi’ is near by word ‘Aksharwadi.we can see the imaginative power of the writer that indirectly described the particular event.

2) Intellectual Indubhai:

 This story was also about suffering of intellectual people. It also highlight the Western thinkers like Nietzsche, Darwin, Milton, Karl Marx, Rilke and Louis Pasteur. Also it describes the Indian literature like Mahabharat , Ramayana etc. Indubhai also teach humanism to the students in his lectures. He talked about thoughts of Gandhiji and other great thinkers. The writer satires on the political leaders who has great intellectual power by speaking on any subject in four to five languages. So he satirise on the political leaders.Another meaning of intellectual is the person who have great knowledge of things. Indubhai has great knowledge of literature. He was not only intellectual but also emotional person.


Connection with contemporary event:

This story is about the Post- Godhra riots in which many people lost their lives, mass rapes of the women, looting shops, burning children and women.The event is widely perceived as the trigger for the Gujarat riots that followed, which resulted in widespread loss of life, destruction of property and homelessness.


                                                                    Thanks......😇


Thinking activity on Waiting for Godot

             Introduction

Waiting for Godot  is a play by Samuel Beckett in which two characters, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), engage in a variety of discussions and encounters while awaiting Godot, who never arrives. Waiting for Godot is Beckett's translation of his own original French-language play, En attendant Godot, and is subtitled (in English only) "a tragicomedy in two acts". The original French text was composed between 9 October 1948 and 29 January 1949.The premiere, directed by Roger Blin, was on 5 January 1953 at the Théâtre de Babylone [fr], Paris. The English-language version premiered in London in 1955. In a poll conducted by the British Royal National Theatre in 1998/99, it was voted the "most significant English language play of the 20th century".


The Samuel Barclay Beckett was born in the Foxrock suburb of Dublin on 13 April 1906, the son of William Frank Beckett (1871–1933), a quantity surveyor of Huguenot descent, and Maria Jones Roe, a nurse. His parents were both 35 when he was born,[5] and had married in 1901. Beckett had one older brother named Frank Edward (1902–1954). At the age of five, he attended a local playschool in Dublin, where he started to learn music, and then moved to Earlsfort House School near Harcourt Street in Dublin. The Becketts were members of the Anglican Church of Ireland.

Beckett's family home, Cooldrinagh, was a large house and garden complete with tennis court built in 1903 by Beckett's father. The house and garden, its surrounding countryside where he often went walking with his father, the nearby Leopardstown Racecourse, the Foxrock railway station, and Harcourt Street station would all feature in his prose and plays. Around 1919 or 1920, he went to Portora Royal School in Enniskillen, which Oscar Wilde had also attended. He left in 1923 and entered Trinity College in Dublin, where he studied modern literature. A natural athlete, he excelled at cricket as a left-handed batsman and a left-arm medium-pace bowler. Later, he played for Dublin University and played two first-class games against Northamptonshire.[6] As a result, he became the only Nobel literature laureate to have played first-class cricket.[7] for Godot is written by Samuel .Here we can see the picture of Samuel backett




Summary of the play.....
Two men, Vladimir and Estragon, meet near a tree. They converse on various topics and reveal that they are waiting there for a man named Godot. While they wait, two other men enter. Pozzo is on his way to the market to sell his slave, Lucky. He pauses for a while to converse with Vladimir and Estragon. Lucky entertains them by dancing and thinking, and Pozzo and Lucky leave.

After Pozzo and Lucky leave, a boy enters and tells Vladimir that he is a messenger from Godot. He tells Vladimir that Godot will not be coming tonight, but that he will surely come tomorrow. Vladimir asks him some questions about Godot and the boy departs. After his departure, Vladimir and Estragon decide to leave, but they do not move as the curtain falls.

The next night, Vladimir and Estragon again meet near the tree to wait for Godot. Lucky and Pozzo enter again, but this time Pozzo is blind and Lucky is dumb. Pozzo does not remember meeting the two men the night before. They leave and Vladimir and Estragon continue to wait.

Shortly after, the boy enters and once again tells Vladimir that Godot will not be coming. He insists that he did not speak to Vladimir yesterday. After he leaves, Estragon and Vladimir decide to leave, but again they do not move as the curtain falls, ending the play.

Next section
Act I: Introduction & Pozzo and Lucky's Entrance
The charactor of the play

 1. What do you think about the characters of the play?

We already know that Samuel Becket has presented two types of relationships in the play. One in the form of Vladimir and Estragon whereas the second is of Pozzo and Lucky. No one can understand the character of Vladimir without comparing it with Estragon. Hence, Estragon is necessary to be discussed along with this major character of the play.

Vladimir thinks logically and takes the decision on the basis of reasoning, hence, we may say that he is the strongest of all. Despite his odd nature, he is loved by the audience as he thinks more than any other character of the play. He has more knowledge than Estragon that makes him a sober and intellectual personality. He time and again tells Estragon that they should wait until Godot arrives. Vladimir also reveals that he once met Godot still he does not remember how exactly Godot lookalike. He also gives hope to Estragon and boosts his moral due to which Estragon agrees to wait for Godot.

Vladimir is not selfish at all. He does not want that Pozzo should sell Lucky. When he realizes that Pozzo is going to sell Lucky, he expresses his deep condolence with him and advises Pozzo not do so. Not only he expresses his sympathy with Lucky but also expresses sharp disapproval and suggests that Lucky should not leave his good master.

2. What do you say about their activities and their significance?
  • The character of Godot in Samuel Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot, a timeless piece that challenged theatre norms in 1950s Europe, even now is still keeping audiences/readers interested by questioning the persona of Godot and the values the character represents. The play’s cultural, philosophical, and sociological contexts force the viewer/reader to reflect upon our own existence and beliefs about the world we are living in. The era in with the play was created and the issues that Beckett was exploring within the play are still relevant today.  As mentioned in the chapter: Roots and Textual Meanings, it is up to the reader/audience to read the metaphors and the symbols within the context of the text, and one may find different meanings from what Beckett had intended. Watching or reading the play incorporates us in the endless waiting for a person.

  • 3. Is there any similarity between the situations in the play and the lockdown period of 2020?

  • of course, we are finding similarity in the play because Now we have so many example of that when Vladimir and Estragon both are waiting for Godot and also similar things are that there are so many person who are just waiting for that Godot will come and save the life of people from the virus.
  • 4.  Did you feel like an existential crisis?
  • yes, we have faced so many existential crisis of that lockdown as well as the condition of people. how poor people are facing this situation also people are dying like so many mosquito killed by the Kalahit. so we can say that Kalahit is corona virus.
  •  5.What did you do to pass time?

  • when the suddenly there was lockdown at that time i was preparing about my sem 6 exam of B.R.S. also i had seen so many movies.it is to be the part of literature student.
  • 6. How was your psychological condition?

  • I was scared that people are facing the problems of the corona. when we can compare with this situation is more terrible for us. how we can alive that is the question of live a life.
  •                                                     Thanks 😊

Friday, April 23, 2021

Thinking activity on The Waste Land

      Introduction👊

The Waste Land, long poem by T.S. Eliot, published in 1922, first in London in The Criterion (October), next in New York City in The Dial (November), and finally in book form, with footnotes by Eliot. The 433-line, five-part poem was dedicated to fellow poet Ezra Pound, who helped condense the original manuscript to nearly half its size. It was one of the most influential works of the 20th century.


About the other of  The poem :T.S Eliot

     


The waste land poem

 Eliot politely insisted that the title was three words beginning with "The". In the modern time style of epic writing is very famous.Epic is very famous this time.This time T.S.Eliot  writes very big a nd long Epic The Waste Land.The waste land is very long Epic.The waste land is decided into five part.This all part like as :


      After a fourth section, "Death by Water," which includes a brief lyrical petition, the culminating fifth section, "What the Thunder Said," concludes with an image of judgment.


1)The Burial Of the Dead ( 76 Lines )

2) A game of Chess ( 96 Lines )

3) The Fire Sermon ( 139 Lines )

4) Death by Water ( 10 lines )

5) What the thunder Said ( 113 Lines ) 


   In a May 1921 letter to New York lawyer and patron of modernism.Eliot read him the manuscript draft of The Waste Land in London, Eliot visited him in the country.He returned from Lausanne in early January 1922. Pound then made detailed editorial comments and significant cuts to the manuscript. Eliot later dedicated the poem to Pound.Eliot sent the manuscript drafts of the poem to John Quinn in October 1922; they reached Quinn in New York in January 1923.Upon Quinn's death in 1924 they were inherited by his sister Julia Anderson. Years later, in the early 1950s, Mrs Anderson's daughter Mary Conroy found the documents in storage.



1) What are your views on the following image after reading 'The Waste Land'? Do you think that Eliot is regressive as compared to Nietzche's views? or Has Eliot achieved universality of thought by recalling mytho-historical answer to the contemporary malaise?



  Answer : Eliot stands for Regressive, backward looking as it tries to find answers of contemporary malaise in Upanishad, Buddhism and Christianity. On the other side Nietzche stands for progressvie and forward looking, in giving solution to the problem of contemporary crises in faith and self.


        In compared to Neitzche's thought, yes Eliot is regressive but it doesn't mean that he only rises question on his contemporary society, he also tries to give way of solution rather than the answers. Cycle of time always moving and when History start repeating one must have to look back and try to learn that what are mistakes our ancestor did and now when time comes to us how we will deal with it? It is certain and right that new questions's answer we couldn't find in Upanishad, Buddhism and christinity but the way of living,understanding towards any situation one can devlop.

  2.What are your views regarding these comments? Is it true that giving free vent to the repressed 'primitive instinct' lead us to happy and satisfied life? or do you agree with Eliot's view that 'salvation of man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition'?

   Answer : Yes, it is truth that giving free vent to the repressed primitive instinct' can lead us to happy and satisfied life, but individually, things and happiness which is satisfying us can harm others and which give pleasure to others can harm us. But as per Eliot views if all follow such culture, tradition and belief in such lifestyle and moralities, a network of understanding can be created human live peacefully.

3) Write about allusions to the Indian thoughts in 'The Waste Land'. (Where, How and Why are the Indian thoughts referred?)


Answer : There are many Indian thought in waste land. Eliot was well read scholar and he includes Indian Upanishad also in his poems.

        The basic theme of the poem based on Indian thought spirituality. Through the spirituality Eliot tried to got solution of sexual perversion and hollowness of Men in modern time. He used Buddhism and  Upnished thoughts in the poem.


Datta , Dayadhvam and Damyata : 


   In this poem Eliot used Indian spiritual  thought  of Datta , Damyata and Dayadhvam. It were used for the people of that time who shattering down and committed suicide and run away from their responsibilities.

 


Datta:


what have we given?


My friend, blood shaking my heart 

The awful daring of a moment's surrender 

Which an age of prudence can never retract 

By this, and this only, we have existed 

Which is not to be found in our obituaries

Or in memories draped by the beneficent spider

Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor

In our empty rooms       



      So in this lines talked about not only charity but giving oneself for some noble cause. Devote oneself for noble needs. It is pious , selfless , sacrifice are not found in any biographies or memory books. Ex. Daan vir Karna and Bhamasha.


 Eliot gives three 'Da':


Datta

To give not only charity but giving oneself for some noble cause.


 Dayadhvam- 

Sympathies yourself with the sorrows and suffering of others, come out of your isolation and love into others.


Damyata- 


Self control, control over one's passion and desire.


      So in Datta talked about Sacrifice,  Damyata talked about self control and Dayadhvam talked about sympathy for  others.



Ganga :


 Ganga was sunken, and the limp leaves

Waited for rain, while the black clouds

Gathered far distant, over Himavant.

The jungle crouched, humped in silence. 

Then spoke the thunder.    

   So In this lines Eliot used Ganga which considered as holy river in India. Also used Himalayas as Himavant. So both are mythically and spiritually connected to India.so here we can say that in this poem t.s.eliot used this holy river word which consider in India. So in this poem we see some points related into the India in this poem. 



Shantih shlok : 



          " Shantih    shantih    shantih "


     The word Shantih connect with Indian spirituality.  In this line used  for some hope and peaceful life. Peace that coming after anxiety.

   Eliot refers to Wisdom of India for spiritual salvation of modern humanity. So by used this Indian thoughts Eliot wanted to resolved the problem like sexual perversion and spiritual draught.  He wanted to gave message about  " The way of life which is spiritual." here we can say that Indian thoughts about peace in every universal things. We should not like vulture, keep others away from having what we actually don't need but be a giver, sympathies with other. Gandhiji also said: ''There is enough on this earth for everybody's need, but not sufficient for one's greed. We should not belivbb in materials and contemporary things that one day will destroy. In this way I think T.S Eliot might found Upnishada's thoughts of ,"Datta", "Damyata", "Dayadhvam", and "Shantih" suitable for universal calmness...

Conclusion

As we know the Waste Land is very hard to understand because it's devided in 5 parts, all parts are presenting different kind of myth  connect with modern erra. But when it becomes easy for us when someone is giving and teaching proper understanding of the poem .Now ,it is easy for me because I have learnt from the classes.which was taken by Dilip sir.so now clear cut concept is in my mind.

Thanks 😊


Saturday, April 17, 2021

Thinking activity on Modern poems

                    Hello readers,

                    Introduction  👀

As a part of task we want to study some modern poems. Basically, the word modernism has very different meaning. however, we are studying the T.S Eliot's poem :The West Land. It is modern poem but very difficult poem without teaching we can't understand. Also, as a part of study we would find the metaphor and Symbol of the Modern poems.

The Embankment

(The fantasia of a fallen gentleman on a cold, bitter night.)

Once, in finesse of fiddles found I ecstasy,
In the flash of gold heels on the hard pavement.
Now see I
That warmth’s the very stuff of poesy.
Oh, God, make small
The old star-eaten blanket of the sky,
That I may fold it round me and in comfort lie.

T. E. Hulme, ‘The Embankment (7 lines). T. E. Hulme (1883-1917) was an influential poet and thinker in the first few years of the twentieth century.

T E Hulme  First, a short paraphrase of the poem: on London’s Embankment (an area well-known for homeless people sleeping rough), a ‘fallen gentleman’ reflects on his past and how he found pleasure in worldly social activities (the ‘finesse of fiddles’ suggesting musical gatherings, such as dances) and beautiful women – probably (given the ‘flash of gold heels on the hard pavement‘) courtesans or prostitutes. But now, down on his luck and most probably sleeping rough on the streets, he realises that warmth is what really matters and is what poets should be singing about. The poem then ends with a heartfelt entreaty to the heavens, with the poem’s speaker beseeching God to make a blanket of the starry sky so that the speaker’s wish for warmth might be granted.


Joseph Campbell, ‘Darkness


Darkness.
I stop to watch a star shine in the boghole –
A star no longer, but a silver ribbon of light.
I look at it, and pass on.

'Star' is a symbol of prosperity and brightness means that there was some goodness in civilization but now it's all dark. If anyone looks at the stars, he or she will sit and admire the beauty of the night, but here post just looks at it and passes on. This reflects the disinterestedness prevalent in modern times.  How modernists were not interested in the so-called brightness of the Victorian age can be seen here. The decayed condition of the civilization is presented.

Edward Storer, ‘Image (3 lines)

Forsaken lovers,
Burning to a chaste white moon,
Upon strange pyres of loneliness and drought.

     poem is about the  poet uses the symbol of white moon as it connects heart of two lovers, while here the poet use it in opposite side that it burns lovers that they can't chaste each other, their loneliness is there though they are together , this shows the modern aspect that people are alone though they are in crowd.

 Ezra Pound, ‘In a Station of the Metro‘ (2 lines)

 The apparition of these faces in the Crowd;

  Petals on a wet, black bough

 Here “Metro” itself is a symbol of Modernism and the crowd represents the people. So here we can say that it represents the people who are living physically but mentally they all are dead because of their daily hasty schedule. “Bough” is a branch of a tree, and here he used “black bough” which means the dead branch of a tree (culture). Here society is a tree and branch is culture.

H. D. (Hilda Doolittle), ‘The Pool (5 lines)

Are you alive?

       I touch you

       You quiver trembling like a sea-fish

       I cover you with my net

       What are you- banded one?

The title ' The pool' gives us an image of stored water. Water symbolizes purity and rebirth. Here water is in pool it's not flowing which symbolises the rottenness of the civilization. This poem reflects the lifelessness in the people who are lost in the monotonous life like a ' fish caught in net'

 Richard Aldington, ‘Insouciance (5 lines)

      

      In and out of the dreary trenches

       Trudging cheerily under the stars

       I make for myself little poems

       Delicate as a flock of doves

       They fly away like white-winged

        Doves.

 This poem shows the carelessness of people . its also seems like war poem and poet talks about life of Soldier as Ajit said earlier in his blog. The metaphor like ' dreary trenches', 'flock of doves' and 'white winged dove' etc used by poet to express his thought about lifestyle of people that how they are unaware and don't have any exitement but still they are going on to live their life.


T. S. Eliot, ‘Morning at the Window(9 lines).

They are rattling breakfast plates in basement kitchens,

And along the trampled edges of the street

I am aware of the damp souls of housemaid

Sprouting despondently at area gates.

 The brown waves of fog toss up to me

Twisted faces from the bottom of the street,

And tear from a passer-by with muddy skirts

An aimless smile that hovers in the air

 And vanishes along the level of the roofs.

      In this poem there are many words like “rattling”, “damp souls”, “despondently”, “fog”, “twisted faces”, “fear”, “aimless”. Here we can find negativity I each line which represents the darker side. In this poem we can find images of “dullness” and “dead spirit”. Here we  can refer  the first part “the burial of dead” of T.S Eliot’s “The Wasteland” in this poem also we can find negativity all around. In this part Eliot used the image of “dull roots”, “snow” and “a heap of broken images”.

William Carlos Williams, ‘The Red Wheelbarrow (8 lines)

so much depends

 upon

a red wheel

barrow

 glazed with rain

water

beside the white

chicken.

Poem is quite confusing as we see it in normal way  it give the  picture of rural scene where the Rainwater, chicken and cart are found but its different from it that it talks about dependence and independence that we are depend on many thing here red wheel barrow suggested the it carrying loads of different things, white Chicken suggests the pure and peaceful atmosphere.


Wallace Stevens, ‘Anecdote of the Jar‘ .

I placed a jar in Tennessee,    

And round it was, upon a hill.  

It made the slovenly wilderness  

Surround that hill.

The wilderness rose up to it,

And sprawled around, no longer wild.  

The jar was round upon the ground  

And tall and of a port in air.

It took dominion everywhere.  

The jar was gray and bare.

It did not give of bird or bush,  

Like nothing else in Tennessee.

The poem is about the control over civilization of a state or a place. Here poet discussed about the state “Tennessee” in United States of America. In this poem poet placed a jar on the hill. After some time jar at hill owns the place slowly and steadily. Through this line poet wants to say that how an outsider comes as different place and owns that place or we can say that an outsider made its place on that place slowly and steadily. There is one word “wilderness” which represents the unsettled way of an outsider. There is a phrase “sprawled outsider” which means to spread out in a disorderly fashion.

E. E. Cummings, ‘l(a (9 lines)

 

l(a

 

le

af

fa

ll

 

s)

one

l

 iness

There is a word “fall” which represents the state of dullness. It can be fall of civilization, individual’s hope or fall of anything else. when we carefully read it it is line that 'a leaf falls on loneliness', when we look at the  modernist structure to write a  poem it also look like leaf falls down , it also suggest the feelings or dreams of people after wars that are broken in small pieces.


                                                                                                                      Thanks😇

 


Sunday, April 11, 2021

The frame study of the Films: "The Modern Times" & "The Great Dictator"

                                         👊Introduction👊

Before the start our frame study, let me introduce the writers of the films. The Charlie Chaplin is the writer of the both the films. He was an english comic actor, film maker , and one of the important things that composer in the era of silent film..

first I want  ask to my readers have you seen any silent and comic movie? if yes, please do the comment with the example of that movies. Also, I would like to tell you that you must watch the both the Charlie Chaplin's movie. when we see the any movie at that time we think that without any words how we can see any film. It's general question of the all of us. so first, we know that who was Charlie Chaplin.


you might have heard and see the Charles Chaplin's The Modern times. let us see the frames through the films.

**frames from ''The Modern times''**


Modern times A story of Industry of individual enterprise -humanity crusading in the pursuit of happiness.
here on the frame, we are seeing the time watch. we can not control it so the watch depicts the importance of the time with the people are working like a sheep. also, majority is that the middle class people are working but the major has lots of time. who comes from the middle class they are just facing the problems.






As  I have mention that the sheep has one routine that one go that way so all will go to choose the same path so as it is modern people are following the schedule.


we can see the major person is reading the newspaper. It might be hard work done by that person because he has been seating on the first table now Charlie Chaplin is just enjoying the all movement like we are definitely modern with the smoking is the hobby even personality of the people so Cigarettes might be thinking like this is in the modern era.-

cured of a nervous break down but without a job, he leaves the hospital to start life a new. Dr says take it easy and avoid excitement.so the great Charlie has so many problems he is just comedian but his comedies like we never feel tired just enjoying the silent activity but affect full for us.

Behind the some upper class people to get liberty but at that time suddenly Charlie come and unknown situation through become part of this movement also fruitful for Charlie goes into the prison by the police kept to him.

here, we see the modernism comes but the poor people are living in the homeless area. They don't have any home both of them are helpless people. if we see the industrialization is developing a lot but middles are in the middle position, richest are becoming a very richest. so this is the modernism. it's depict by Charlie Chaplin without seeing any word.

The modern things are only for a richest man just experiment on innocent worker of the factory. so reality is this major always catch the weak man. Also, we see the modern are becoming a more modern.
she is telling to Charlie Chaplin what is the use of trying?
Charlies Reply: " back up Never say die. We'll get along.

in the modern time all prisoner follow the police man with his whistle. It's symbol of the rules and regulation with the order.


   **Frames from ''The Great Dictator''**



In this film Charlie Chaplin representing the. two roles. both have different thoughts. one is very cruel second one is kind and good man. however, the people of Hitler's are under the Jew people also we see the modernism all the seen are reality at now a days. The powerful man always desire to reign on the poor people.


There are so many weapon for a war are still alive in  the modern time some of the reason of that they are just little bit worried for using the technological modern weapon because we know that the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb blast.

here you can see the Hitler is imagine that world is in my hand. He is playing with the balloon like 🐕 is driving the four wheel.

                  👇conclusion👇
The films are so good because the modernism through reality in the frame part, if we see some frame so easily we  can understand that what Charlie Chaplin wants to tell us, it is not just comedy but the modernism in the both the films. Silent films are always amazing today we knew that.

Thanks😊





Daily schedule Report Dated: 21/10/2024

  Daily schedule Report  Date: 21/10/2024  Monday  Hi! Good Morning Friends. By day, I would like to talk about my daily activities in...